← Search

Antonia Parchuri

Tulsa, OK
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
150 matches · 78W–72L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Antonia Parchuri to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history150 matches
L
2026-09-03 · Burris/LF/40&over3.5W · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Seifert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2
L
2026-08-19 · Lee/LF/tri 4.5W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jenny Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-14 · Lee/LF/tri 4.5W · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jenny Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-11 · Whitten/LF 18s 4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bobbi Jo Gibson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-05-20 · Lilly/LF 18s 3.5 W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Traci Hazel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-29 · Whitten/LF 18s 4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bobbi Jo Gibson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-04-20 · Lilly/LF 18s 3.5 W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Traci Hazel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-08 · Lilly/LF 18s 3.5 W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Coates
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-03-31 · Lilly/LF 18s 3.5 W · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Prox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-11-20 · Metcalf/LF/4.0W · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-11-04 · Prox/LF/3.5W · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Buechler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2025-10-13 · Metcalf/LF/4.0W · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 48.9% of games
3.0
77.8%
21W–6L · 60.9% of games
3.5
51.6%
47W–44L · 48.7% of games
4.0
26.1%
6W–17L · 39.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 43% of the time
#1 Singles
43%
65 matches
#2 Singles
20%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
7%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova