← Search

Sarah Haygood

— year-end
79 matches · 36W–43L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Sarah Haygood to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history79 matches
W
2026-06-23 · Rowe/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eleanor Mascioli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-06-16 · Rowe/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Hobson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-09 · Rowe/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine Garrott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-02 · Rowe/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Malaney George
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-06 · Carlisle/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly MacQueen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
Laura Collins / Marnie Denman
2026-04-28 · Fairey/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Palmer Burt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-15 · Carlisle/Memphis · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
Meg Smith / Carly McWatters
2026-04-09 · Fairey/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Keras
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
Lisa McIntosh / Jamie Harris
2026-04-08 · Carlisle/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ruth Garrett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-01 · Carlisle/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Malaney George
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-03-26 · Fairey/Memphis · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
Laura Collins / Katy Hottinger
2026-03-25 · Carlisle/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Malaney George
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
Teams24 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
52.9%
27W–24L · 51.2% of games
4.0
23.1%
3W–10L · 34.9% of games
6.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 55.4% of games
7.5
0%
0W–6L · 35.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
10 matches
#1 Singles
11%
9 matches
#2 Singles
8%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert