← Search

Eleanor Mascioli

Memphis, TN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
47 matches · 18W–29L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Eleanor Mascioli to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history47 matches
L
2026-06-30 · Rowe/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Martha Robertson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-23 · Rowe/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Haygood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-06-02 · Rowe/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Friary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-05-06 · Carlisle/Memphis · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-04-30 · Carlisle/Memphis · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-08 · Carlisle/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maggie Lovell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-04-03 · Carlisle/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly MacQueen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
Kristina Dell'Orco / Laura Robinson
2025-11-12 · Lovell/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alexandra Roll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2025-10-29 · Lovell/Memphis · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2025-10-22 · Lovell/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly MacQueen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-10-15 · Lovell/Memphis · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2025-09-11 · Palmer/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Emily Quinn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
42.1%
16W–22L · 46.9% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 42.7% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
11 matches
#1 Singles
15%
7 matches
#2 Singles
13%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
6%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe