← Search

Mary Susan Easterling

— year-end
141 matches · 88W–53L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Mary Susan Easterling to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history141 matches
W
2026-08-11 · MEasterling.40C-HVCC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amy Brisley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-18 · KMcWhorter-DUR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Walsh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
Megan Jones
2026-05-06 · SEasterling-HVCC · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-22 · SEasterling-HVCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Lacoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-04-20 · MBiese-HVCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alana Argersinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-17 · 7 SEasterling-HVCC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Brisley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-04-15 · SEasterling-HVCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Jefferson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-30 · MBiese-HVCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hadley Nixon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-03-27 · 7 SEasterling-HVCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Abigail Presson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-25 · SEasterling-HVCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Lacoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-02-16 · MBiese-HVCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Pike
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-08 · #3 Doubles · with Amanda Lacoff championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Teams46 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
20%
1W–4L · 44.6% of games
3.5
72.5%
37W–14L · 58.8% of games
4.0
46.7%
14W–16L · 48.4% of games
6.5
70.6%
12W–5L · 57.7% of games
7.5
76%
19W–6L · 59.6% of games
8.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
26 matches
#1 Singles
10%
14 matches
#2 Singles
6%
8 matches
#3 Singles
5%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe