← Search

Jane Limkakeng

Cary, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
329 matches · 216W–113L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jane Limkakeng to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history329 matches
W
2026-09-11 · ACP.Ress · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Anne-Marie Conklin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-27 · Ji.Darnell18C · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Roni Bonello
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-24 · Er.Conigliaro40C · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ramona Holdstock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Laura Davidson / Ann Tucker
2026-08-14 · ACP.Ress · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Maya Ress
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-08-13 · TOC.Allara · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Hallie Shinn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
Emily Jones / Christa Resavy
2026-08-07 · ACP.Ress · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with RANEE KUMAR
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-05 · La.Brock40M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with W Troutman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-11 · CWilliamson-CHCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carey Baddour
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-09 · CWilliamson-CHCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Shelby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-02 · CWilliamson-CHCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carey Baddour
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-05-31 · La.Brock40M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dat Pham mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-26 · CWilliamson-CHCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Keri A Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams52 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
62.3%
76W–46L · 55.6% of games
4.5
40%
6W–9L · 46.9% of games
7.5
75%
9W–3L · 61% of games
8.5
75%
75W–25L · 58.4% of games
4.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 53.9% of games
8.0mixed
68.4%
13W–6L · 61.3% of games
9.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
124 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
123 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
79 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer