← Search

Julie Smerdel

— year-end
116 matches · 53W–63L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Julie Smerdel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history116 matches
L
Melinda Kane / Sana Khwaja
2026-05-01 · Olympic 1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jana Tice
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-04-24 · Olympic 1 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Yem
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-03-10 · Wedgewood · #2 Doubles · with Iryna Ferritto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-03-06 · Olympic 1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jana Tice
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-4
W
2026-03-03 · Wedgewood · #2 Doubles · with Iryna Ferritto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-01-23 · Olympic 1 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Wilmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2025-12-05 · Wedgewood · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leslie Holman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-10-31 · Wedgewood · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Nash
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-10-24 · Wedgewood · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Haddow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
Kim Keys / Emily Smith
2025-09-05 · Wedgewood · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Schmid
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-08-21 · Wedgewood · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kavita Sharma
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-07-17 · Wedgewood · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kavita Sharma
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-6
Teams27 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
45.5%
5W–6L · 48.8% of games
3.5
59.4%
19W–13L · 55.2% of games
4.0
36.4%
12W–21L · 44.4% of games
7.0
38.5%
5W–8L · 50.6% of games
7.5
30%
3W–7L · 40% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
64 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova