← Search

Rhonda Kaspar

Cary, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
246 matches · 118W–128L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Rhonda Kaspar to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history246 matches
L
2026-09-10 · TOC.Derks · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jessica Fairfax
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-03 · TOC.Derks · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Denise Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-27 · TOC.Derks · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Priti Ghatlia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-08-18 · TOC.Campbell · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cora Darrah
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
Denise Wilson / Angki Sager
2026-08-04 · TOC.Campbell · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nancy Myer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
Julie Evans / Meghan Arndts
2026-08-03 · TOC.Myer · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elizabeth Flynt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-01 · ACP.Sinopoli · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Hoffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-10 · ACP.Sinopoli · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janet Constantino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-03 · ACP.Sinopoli · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janet Constantino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-05-01 · #2 Doubles · with Nancy Myer championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-27 · TOC.Hargrove · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janet Constantino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-14 · TOC.Cardella · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nadine Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
50%
2W–2L · 39% of games
3.0
63.1%
65W–38L · 55% of games
3.5
19.2%
10W–42L · 39.6% of games
6.5
48.6%
36W–38L · 51.4% of games
6.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
106 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
70 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
66 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams