← Search

Rebecca Jacobsen

Cary, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
353 matches · 170W–183L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Rebecca Jacobsen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history353 matches
W
2026-09-08 · PW.West · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Donna West
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
Denise Wilson / Rhonda Kaspar
2026-09-03 · PW.Jacobsen · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Chase Brady
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-31 · PW.Fitzgerald · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelly Bendel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-20 · PW.Jacobsen · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cathy Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-18 · PW.West · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Marta Keyser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-11 · PW.West · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Meg Mueller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-18 · TOC.Stutt · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ron Jacobsen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-27 · TOC.Stutt · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mahesh Salian mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-30 · TOC.Stutt · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Zaw Naing Tun mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-28 · PW.Stylski · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angie Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-04-23 · PW.Martin · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elaine Auslander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
Laura Clark / Melanie Tharrington
2026-04-20 · Mi.Fitzgerald55A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marylynn Fitzgerald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams75 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
69.6%
16W–7L · 61% of games
3.5
52.6%
81W–73L · 51.2% of games
4.0
13.6%
3W–19L · 29.3% of games
5.5
50%
2W–2L · 56.3% of games
6.5
62.3%
38W–23L · 53.4% of games
7.5
25%
11W–33L · 43% of games
6.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
114 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
108 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
84 matches
#1 Singles
5%
18 matches
#2 Singles
5%
16 matches
#3 Singles
2%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova