← Search

Jackie Renner Mills

Germantown, TN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
31 matches · 13W–18L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jackie Renner Mills to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history31 matches
W
2026-08-23 · Churchey/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Carla Higgins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-08-20 · Churchey/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Julie Mullins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-16 · Churchey/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Laura Huss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-26 · Churchey/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Roz Wallace
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-28 · Churchey/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Harriet Dodd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-07 · Churchey/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Umsted
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-17 · Churchey/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Umsted
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-26 · Churchey/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pamela Hauber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-04-12 · Churchey/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maggie Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-03-07 · Mills/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Durham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-01 · Churchey/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tricia Bergeron
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-09-18 · Churchey/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Laura Huss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 58.6% of games
3.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 35.7% of games
6.5
38.5%
5W–8L · 45% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
39%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer