← Search

Elena Pinkus

Raleigh, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
192 matches · 124W–68L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Elena Pinkus to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history192 matches
L
2026-08-05 · Me.Golder18T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cooper Thornhill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-04 · Me.Golder18T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lorraine Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-02 · Me.Golder18C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Hannah Boghosian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-07-29 · Me.Golder18T · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Claire Hying
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-27 · Jo.Whalen18M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Whalen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
N/A
2026-07-22 · Me.Golder18T · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hannah Boghosian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-11 · Me.Golder18T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meredith Archie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-15 · Jo.Whalen18M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Russell Riley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-13 · Me.Golder18T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meredith Archie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-06-01 · Jo.Whalen18M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Craig Schauman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-31 · Me.Golder18T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Courtney Whalen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-05-30 · Me.Golder18T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lizzie Hanes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
82.1%
23W–5L · 65.1% of games
4.0
66%
66W–34L · 58.4% of games
4.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 45.8% of games
7.5
50%
7W–7L · 50% of games
8.5
50%
5W–5L · 54.8% of games
4.0mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 59.3% of games
8.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 36.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 24% of the time
#1 Doubles
24%
46 matches
#2 Singles
23%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
44 matches
#1 Singles
15%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
19 matches
#3 Singles
5%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova