← Search

Kristen Corrigan

— year-end
80 matches · 51W–29L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Kristen Corrigan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history80 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Lane/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Raquel Lane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-09-08 · Lane/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elizabeth Babcock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-09-02 · Lane/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tiffany Knighton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-09-01 · Lane/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Maryellen Tabor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-08-20 · Lane/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elizabeth Babcock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-08-12 · Lane/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Randi Mullaney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
Kim Whipple / Maria Gonzalez
2026-08-05 · Lane/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Raquel Lane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-21 · Carpenter/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jacqueline Carpenter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-14 · Martin/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janine Lammel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-30 · Martin/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Claudia Ziegler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-23 · Martin/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Bloodworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-16 · Carpenter/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dorothy Work
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Teams34 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
80%
4W–1L · 63.5% of games
3.0
72.5%
29W–11L · 59.6% of games
3.5
38.1%
8W–13L · 46.9% of games
6.5
71.4%
10W–4L · 65% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 40% of the time
#3 Doubles
40%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
18 matches
#2 Singles
16%
13 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
10 matches
#1 Singles
6%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert