← Search

Dorothy Work

Collierville, TN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
97 matches · 42W–55L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Dorothy Work to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history97 matches
L
Diane Brower / Kelly Baker
2026-09-09 · Brackett/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Carly McWatters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-01 · Carpenter/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brooke Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-26 · Brackett/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Carly McWatters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-08-12 · Brackett/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Melony Bratton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-14 · Carpenter/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nicci Watson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-09 · Carpenter/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cheryl Murphy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
Jennifer London / Libby Nabors
2026-06-18 · Carpenter/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nicci Watson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-16 · Carpenter/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristen Corrigan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-09 · Carpenter/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jacqueline Carpenter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-04 · Carpenter/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nicci Watson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-05-07 · Eckelkamp/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paige Vaughan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-06 · Campbell/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicci Watson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
100%
4W–0L · 71.6% of games
3.0
58.1%
25W–18L · 50.9% of games
3.5
21.9%
7W–25L · 39.9% of games
5.5
25%
1W–3L · 48.6% of games
6.5
35.7%
5W–9L · 45.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
17 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert