← Search

Raquel Lane

— year-end
94 matches · 62W–32L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Raquel Lane to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history94 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Lane/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kristen Corrigan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-09-08 · Lane/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lauren Bloodworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-09-03 · Martin/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Missy Gulick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-08-25 · Lane/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Terri Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-12 · Lane/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jill Bishop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-08-11 · Lane/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Andrea Boucher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
Kim Whipple / Maria Gonzalez
2026-08-05 · Lane/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kristen Corrigan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
Elizabeth Day / Wendi Mihalko
2026-07-14 · Echols/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shannon Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-11 · Brackett/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gabe LaBonia mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-07-02 · Echols/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maryellen Tabor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-30 · Echols/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maryellen Tabor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-25 · Echols/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Hunt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Teams53 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
85%
17W–3L · 68.3% of games
3.5
62%
31W–19L · 53.5% of games
5.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 59.4% of games
7.5
20%
1W–4L · 40.8% of games
3.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 66.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
20 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer