← Search

Jeff Moncrief

Cary, NC
4.0A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
49 matches · 20W–29L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Jeff Moncrief to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history49 matches
L
2026-09-13 · MD.Hoffman · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Darren Koch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-30 · MD.Hoffman · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stan Wingo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-03 · MD.Riddick · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Wangen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-04-19 · MD.Riddick · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Wangen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
Chris Johnson / Christian Jacobsen
2026-04-12 · MD.Riddick · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Wangen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-03-22 · MD.Riddick · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Stanton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-09-07 · MD.Winzenz · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jerfi Cicin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-08-17 · MD.Winzenz · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mark Townley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-08-10 · MD.Winzenz · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Andrew Ligay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2025-06-24 · MD.Winzenz · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
Ryan Sheppard / Matthew Glenn
2025-05-03 · MD.Moncrief · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with John van Campen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-04-13 · MD.Moncrief · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christopher Frederick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 56.3% of games
4.0
28.6%
6W–15L · 41.7% of games
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.5
0%
0W–4L · 40.3% of games
6.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 59.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
11 matches
#1 Singles
12%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer