← Search

Christine Qubeck

Apex, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
147 matches · 60W–87L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Christine Qubeck to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history147 matches
L
2026-08-21 · BENT.Stratemeier · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Amy Alford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-07 · BENT.Stratemeier · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Amy Alford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-05 · BENT.Wagner · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
Sarah Forman
2026-08-04 · BENT.Wagner · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-08-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Frazier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katherine Fehervari
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-28 · ACP.Qubeck · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melissa Raasch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-27 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary T Long
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-21 · BENT.Wagner · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-14 · ACP.Qubeck · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dana Frazier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shirley Liu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-17 · BENT.Wagner · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
2.5
61.1%
33W–21L · 58.6% of games
3.0
15.1%
8W–45L · 35% of games
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.0
75%
3W–1L · 63.6% of games
5.5
45%
9W–11L · 46.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 27% of the time
#2 Doubles
27%
40 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
39 matches
#1 Singles
17%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
24 matches
#2 Singles
7%
10 matches
#3 Singles
5%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer