← Search

Susan Williamson

— year-end
110 matches · 66W–44L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Susan Williamson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history110 matches
L
2026-08-10 · #1 Doubles · with Elizabeth Johnson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-04 · RRC Set 2 Win 55+ 7.0W · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janice Cavatoni
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-30 · RRC Set 2 Win 55+ 7.0W · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-08 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
Heather Goldman / Stacey Kaplan
2026-07-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6
W
2026-06-30 · RRC Set 2 Win 55+ 7.0W · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-06-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-21 · County Tennis Club -18+ 3.5 -County Court Crushers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deidre Kimble
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-4
W
2026-05-20 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-05-14 · County Tennis Club -18+ 3.5 -County Court Crushers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marielise Watts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-05-12 · RRC Set 2 Win 55+ 7.0W · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Suzanne Trapp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
Teams19 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
51.9%
28W–26L · 50% of games
6.0
50%
2W–2L · 51.7% of games
7.0
71.4%
35W–14L · 55% of games
6.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
54 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
18 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams