← Search

Danielle Nappi

Somerset, NJ
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
103 matches · 68W–35L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Danielle Nappi to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history103 matches
L
2026-08-30 · Smash & Splash · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Fabio Shuyama mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-07-12 · Smash & Splash · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Egbert Baldovino mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-28 · Lost-Soles · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ron Mendoza mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-01-31 · Lost-Soles · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ron Mendoza mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-10 · Everlasting Lobstoppers · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ron Mendoza mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-1
W
2025-11-08 · #1 Doubles · with Ron Mendoza championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2025-11-01 · Everlasting Lobstoppers · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ron Mendoza mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2025-07-12 · MSU: Glam Slam · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pamela Calaquian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-06-29 · MSU: Glam Slam · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pamela Calaquian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-5
W
2025-06-08 · #3 Doubles · with Ron Mendoza championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2025-06-07 · #2 Doubles · with Ron Mendoza championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
John Considine / Alice Kellepourey
2025-06-06 · #1 Doubles · with Dan McGrath championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
55%
11W–9L · 50.7% of games
7.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 52% of games
7.5mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 54% of games
8.0mixed
74.6%
47W–16L · 57.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
24 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer