← Search

Jeff Castera

Trenton, NJ
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
61 matches · 42W–19L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jeff Castera to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history61 matches
W
2026-08-03 · #2 Doubles · with Onkar Singh championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · with Onkar Singh championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-06-28 · NJD/We Are Still A Problem · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-03 · NJD/We Are Still A Problem · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amrit Basu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-10 · On Point! · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Samir Shah
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-03 · NJD/We Are Still A Problem · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Kong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-04-19 · NJD/We Are Still A Problem · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-03-22 · We Are A Problem · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mohammed Nayeemulla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-15 · We Are A Problem · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with ILAN GAMBURG
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-03-01 · We Are A Problem · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Onkar Singh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-2, 1-0
W
2026-01-18 · We Are A Problem · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Lyons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-01-11 · We Are A Problem · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Kong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
84.6%
33W–6L · 69.9% of games
4.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 29.6% of games
8.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 47.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
6 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams