← Search

Louise O'Reilly

— year-end
80 matches · 52W–28L · seasons 2019–2024

Captains: add Louise O'Reilly to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history80 matches
W
2024-10-18 · #3 Doubles · with Lois Peterson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2024-10-10 · Wasatch Rec Center-Berg/Hronek · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amber Greenwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2024-10-03 · Wasatch Rec Center-Berg/Hronek · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Probst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2024-09-12 · Wasatch Rec Center-Berg/Hronek · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angie Neuberger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2024-09-11 · Eccles Tennis Center-Smith · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carole Sharp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2024-08-30 · Eccles Tennis Center-Smith · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carole Sharp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2024-08-22 · Wasatch Rec Center-Berg/Hronek · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Labrum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2024-07-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Schulz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2024-07-15 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Martsie Earl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2024-05-24 · Wasatch Rec Center-Berg/Hronek · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Caldwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2024-05-23 · Wasatch Rec Center-Berg/Hronek · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Schulz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2024-05-15 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lee Chase
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
Teams21 teams · 2021–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
76.9%
10W–3L · 58.8% of games
4.5
55.6%
10W–8L · 55.9% of games
8.0
77.1%
27W–8L · 56.9% of games
9.0
33.3%
3W–6L · 48.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
40%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer