← Search

Liz Kasberg

Cary, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
360 matches · 187W–173L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Liz Kasberg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history360 matches
W
2026-08-26 · LOCH.Kasberg · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rochelle Grieco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-24 · LOCH.Cinoman · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ilona Peszlen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-21 · LOCH.Kasberg · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kristine Pelt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-19 · LOCH.Kasberg · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Adrianne Leinbach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-14 · LOCH.Kasberg · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Laura Stein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-10 · LOCH.Kasberg · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Susan Lebowitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-06-10 · ACP.Sinopoli · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Shelby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-07 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Adrianne Leinbach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-06 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Adrianne Leinbach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-05-21 · #1 Doubles · with Laura Davidson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-20 · ACP.Sinopoli · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Shelby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-3
W
2026-05-17 · #3 Doubles · with Brook Holton Sheahan championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams73 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
100%
6W–0L · 66% of games
4.0
56.9%
132W–100L · 52.3% of games
4.5
25%
1W–3L · 40.3% of games
7.5
47.5%
29W–32L · 49.7% of games
8.5
34.3%
12W–23L · 43.3% of games
8.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 40.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
137 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
119 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
101 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches
#3 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova