← Search

Nick Zelano

Raleigh, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
127 matches · 55W–72L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Nick Zelano to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history127 matches
W
2026-07-29 · TOC.Merck · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tatiana Nevmyrych mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-07-23 · TOC.Merck · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tatiana Nevmyrych mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-31 · TOC.Merck · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tatiana Nevmyrych mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-17 · TOC.Merck · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Hankinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-05-03 · TOC.Merck · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dat Pham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-04-26 · TOC.Merck · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristofer Merck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
Scott Anderson / Scott Riley
2026-04-16 · TOC.Merck · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eli Jerchower
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-12 · TOC.Merck · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dat Pham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-04-11 · TOC.Merck · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristofer Merck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-02 · TOC.Merck · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Collin Carter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-21 · TOC.Merck · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Collin Carter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
Raymond Xu
2025-11-25 · TING.Kasinadhuni · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
46.8%
37W–42L · 49.1% of games
7.5
43.8%
7W–9L · 44.6% of games
8.5
20%
2W–8L · 37.6% of games
8.0mixed
41.2%
7W–10L · 47.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 26% of the time
#1 Doubles
26%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
26 matches
#1 Singles
17%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
19 matches
#2 Singles
13%
16 matches
#3 Singles
8%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova