← Search

Frank von Hendricks

Gambrills, MD
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
132 matches · 62W–70L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Frank von Hendricks to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history132 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Walsh · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Belinda McLean mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-18 · Walsh · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Belinda McLean mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-01 · Chaney · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nnamaka Nwakaihe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-06-04 · Koch · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scott A Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-05-28 · Koch · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Greg Koch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-05-27 · Kuhn 2026 18+ 4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Kuhn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-05-16 · Kuhn 2026 18+ 4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Barry Herman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-05-07 · Net Commanders · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with George Sybert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-02 · Net Commanders · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott A Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-25 · Kuhn 2026 18+ 4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mike Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-04-22 · Koch · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mike Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-15 · Koch · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Greg Koch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 55.1% of games
4.0
26.1%
6W–17L · 43.2% of games
6.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
75%
3W–1L · 62.9% of games
7.5
28.6%
4W–10L · 46.1% of games
3.5mixed
53.3%
8W–7L · 52.9% of games
4.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 47.5% of games
6.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 58.7% of games
6.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 58.4% of games
7.0mixed
50%
15W–15L · 52.6% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
4W–8L · 48.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 45% of the time
#2 Doubles
45%
59 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
34 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King