← Search

Belinda McLean

Annapolis, MD
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
392 matches · 228W–164L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Belinda McLean to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history392 matches
L
2026-09-10 · Nicholson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meghan Reinhart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-09 · Walsh · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Frank von Hendricks mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-31 · Nicholson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ellyn McLaughlin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-18 · Walsh · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Frank von Hendricks mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-15 · Nicholson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ellyn McLaughlin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-05 · Nicholson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Arnold
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-03 · Nicholson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Bolduc
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-28 · Party at the Net · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Price
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-26 · Party at the Net · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Price
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-12 · Party at the Net · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Noronha
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-08 · Party at the Net · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Francis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-14 · Party at the Net · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Noronha
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams61 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
0.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 43.5% of games
3.5
72%
77W–30L · 58.7% of games
4.0
44.6%
33W–41L · 47.8% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
75%
21W–7L · 59% of games
8.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 55% of games
3.5mixed
52.6%
10W–9L · 53.1% of games
4.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 36.7% of games
6.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 41.9% of games
7.0mixed
67.7%
44W–21L · 58.4% of games
7.5mixed
50%
5W–5L · 54.7% of games
8.0mixed
50%
8W–8L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
153 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
124 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
95 matches
#1 Singles
2%
8 matches
#2 Singles
2%
8 matches
#3 Singles
1%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe