← Search

Rachel Lovelace

— year-end
38 matches · 14W–24L · seasons 2024–2025

Captains: add Rachel Lovelace to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history38 matches
L
2025-09-15 · Cox-Lovelace/META · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christina Betancourt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-09-13 · Cox-Lovelace/META · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ruth Jackson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-09-11 · Cox-Lovelace/META · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Madga Cox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2025-08-31 · Hagood6.5/META · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Shannon Hinkle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2025-08-26 · Alice/META · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Beth Shults-kumar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2025-08-25 · Cox-Lovelace/META · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ruth Jackson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-08-24 · Hagood6.5/META · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Theresa Boyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-08-19 · Alice/META · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kirsten Hoskins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-08-18 · Hagood40Tri/META · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Regan Jordan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
Emily Jo Doran / Jessica Taylor
2025-08-17 · Alice/META · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Warner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-08-14 · Hagood40Tri/META · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ju Mo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2025-08-07 · Hagood40Tri/META · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Regan Jordan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
Teams29 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
47.1%
8W–9L · 47.3% of games
3.5
25%
1W–3L · 37.1% of games
6.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 41.8% of games
3.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 41% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 42% of the time
#3 Doubles
42%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
7 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer