← Search

Ruth Jackson

— year-end
39 matches · 21W–18L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Ruth Jackson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history39 matches
L
2026-03-14 · SMEAD/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathy Holloway
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W
2025-09-16 · Cox-Lovelace/META · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ju Mo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2025-09-15 · Cox-Lovelace/META · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ju Mo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-09-13 · Cox-Lovelace/META · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rachel Lovelace
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-08-30 · Cox-Lovelace/META · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christina Betancourt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-08-25 · Cox-Lovelace/META · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rachel Lovelace
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-08-19 · Alice/META · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Beth Shults-kumar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
Emily Jo Doran / Jessica Taylor
2025-08-12 · Alice/META · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Warner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-07-27 · Liu3.5_40/META · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Keith Chalmers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
Linda Jones / Kate Watson
2025-07-19 · Smead/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joy Benson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2025-07-12 · Smead/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joy Benson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-05-10 · Smead/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angela Harr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
Teams32 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
100%
6W–0L · 75% of games
3.5
43.8%
7W–9L · 46.3% of games
6.5
58.3%
7W–5L · 53.3% of games
3.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 35.4% of games
3.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
10 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer