← Search

Emily Cutts

Raleigh, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
101 matches · 66W–35L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Emily Cutts to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history101 matches
L
2026-08-08 · Ti.Barrier18C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Whitney Holmes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6
W
Anne Salter / Tara Kerr
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Lowry Liggon championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Lowry Liggon championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-19 · #3 Doubles · with Julie Kelly championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-15 · Ti.Barrier18T · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Helen Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-06-07 · Ti.Barrier40T · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hilary Kuss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-31 · Ti.Barrier40T · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Newton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-11 · Ti.Barrier18A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lowry Liggon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-04-28 · Ti.Barrier40A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Lindsay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
Lauren King / Rose Whitehurst
2026-04-25 · Ti.Barrier18A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachael Yelverton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-04-18 · TOC.Lindsay · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tiffany Barrier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-14 · Ti.Barrier40A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lowry Liggon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
81.8%
9W–2L · 67.7% of games
4.0
50%
13W–13L · 52.9% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
90%
9W–1L · 73.1% of games
7.5
72.2%
13W–5L · 64.2% of games
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
44 matches
#1 Doubles
36%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
20 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert