← Search

Dan Podrasky

Raleigh, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
114 matches · 67W–47L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Dan Podrasky to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history114 matches
W
2026-08-30 · Ch.Wasko18C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chris Wasko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-08-09 · Ch.Wasko18C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kevin Kokal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
Jeremy Chen
2026-06-13 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
Huan Tran
2026-06-11 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-05-19 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-17 · MD.Riddick · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Caldwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-05-12 · Ch.Whitehorne18A · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-06 · Am.Narula40A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sameer Cheema
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
Ian Campbell
2026-05-05 · Ch.Whitehorne18A · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-22 · Am.Narula40A · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-19 · MD.Riddick · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Fisher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-04-14 · Ch.Whitehorne18A · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
63.4%
59W–34L · 56.4% of games
4.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 42.5% of games
7.5
50%
4W–4L · 56.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 28% of the time
#1 Singles
28%
32 matches
#2 Singles
19%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
18 matches
#3 Singles
16%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
11%
13 matches
#1 Doubles
9%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe