← Search

Sameer Cheema

— year-end
119 matches · 57W–62L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Sameer Cheema to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history119 matches
W
2026-05-06 · Am.Narula40A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dan Podrasky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-05 · TOC.Pasangulapati · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ramana Sodem
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-04-30 · TOC.Perian · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amrit Narula
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
Erik Johnson / Jason Liner
2026-04-29 · Am.Narula40A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Solomon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-04-28 · RGoff-DUR · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laurence Isaacs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
Amit Kumar / David Schumann
2026-04-27 · TOC.Pasangulapati · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Spining
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-25 · TOC.Spining · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with ARUN SELVARAJ
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
W
2026-04-19 · TOC.Pasangulapati · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eslam Soliman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-04-12 · TOC.Spining · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mark Spining
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-11 · TOC.Perian · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amrit Narula
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-04-08 · TOC.Spining · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mark Spining
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-06 · TOC.Pasangulapati · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
Teams44 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
69%
20W–9L · 60.5% of games
4.0
32.6%
14W–29L · 42.1% of games
4.5
0%
0W–6L · 32.7% of games
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 58.3% of games
3.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 43.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 30% of the time
#2 Doubles
30%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
27 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
25 matches
#1 Singles
14%
17 matches
#2 Singles
8%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams