← Search

Jaime Summers

Tupelo, MS
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
30 matches · 22W–8L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Jaime Summers to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history30 matches
W
2026-08-19 · Howell · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Briley Clement
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-20 · Lindsey 40+ TRI · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Donna McCormack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-15 · Lindsey 40+ TRI · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Howell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-1
W
2026-07-06 · Summers · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brent Waldrop mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-14 · Summers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Quinn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-03-30 · Tammy Chapman · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shellie ORear
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-22 · Kelly Young 4.0 18s · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tabitha Pitts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-03-01 · Kelly Young 4.0 18s · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-09-29 · Amanda Howell · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Briley Clement
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-09-21 · Amanda Howell · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelly Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-09-08 · Amanda Howell · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelly Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-08-19 · Amanda Howell · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Briley Clement
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
40%
2W–3L · 47.4% of games
4.0
92.3%
12W–1L · 67.2% of games
7.5
60%
3W–2L · 56.4% of games
4.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 68.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer