← Search

Carrie Curtis

Greenwood, AR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
38 matches · 20W–18L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Carrie Curtis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history38 matches
L
2026-07-29 · MORRIS/FS/HCC · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Katy Prater
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-26 · MORRIS/FS/HCC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katy Prater
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-12 · MORRIS/FS/HCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sara Adair
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-07-07 · MORRIS/FS/HCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Irgens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-10 · MORRIS/FS/HCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katy Prater
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-11 · Curtis/Greenwood/BG · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Malarie McFerran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-05-09 · Curtis/Greenwood/BG · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katy Prater
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-04 · Curtis/Greenwood/BG · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Malarie McFerran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-04-30 · Curtis/Greenwood/CM · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lexi Morris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-04-30 · Curtis/Greenwood/CM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Malarie McFerran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-04-27 · Curtis/Greenwood/CM · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Malarie McFerran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
Laura King / Cathy Rollinson
2026-04-24 · Curtis/Greenwood/BG · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Malarie McFerran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 61.8% of games
3.5
39.1%
9W–14L · 46.9% of games
6.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
3 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match
#3 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams