← Search

Jessica Lancaster

Bartlett, TN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
70 matches · 38W–32L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jessica Lancaster to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history70 matches
W
2026-08-30 · Conrad/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stacey Hyde
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-08-23 · Conrad/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Robin Barringer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-18 · Miller/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cameron Seay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-06 · Lancaster/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sol Weaver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-29 · Goodnight/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Cates
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-04-26 · Lancaster/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Cates
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-04-25 · Goodnight/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gail Paige
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-04-19 · Lancaster/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dee Bias
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-12 · Miller/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sol Weaver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-03-29 · Miller/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Betsy Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-22 · Lancaster/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dee Bias
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-21 · Goodnight/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelley Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams66 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
54.5%
24W–20L · 53.6% of games
4.0
33.3%
3W–6L · 44.6% of games
7.5
64.7%
11W–6L · 56.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
18 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
4 matches
#1 Singles
4%
3 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer