← Search

Dee Bias

Memphis, TN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
49 matches · 29W–20L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Dee Bias to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history49 matches
L
2026-08-02 · Moore/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mario Grant mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-11 · Moore/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Darnell Wormely mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-24 · Moore/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Micheal Moore mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-02 · Moore/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Micheal Moore mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-06 · Lancaster/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-04-19 · Lancaster/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Lancaster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-03-29 · Lancaster/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Goodnight
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-03-22 · Lancaster/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Lancaster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-08 · Lancaster/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-03-01 · Lancaster/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Kitabchi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-11-22 · Weaver/Dannemiller · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Reddin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-11-12 · Weaver/Dannemiller · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Reddin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
66.7%
24W–12L · 56.8% of games
4.0
60%
3W–2L · 60.2% of games
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 48.1% of games
4.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 42.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
13 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova