← Search

Gail Poole-Vaughn

Columbia, MD
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
204 matches · 91W–113L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Gail Poole-Vaughn to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history204 matches
L
2026-09-03 · Baldwin · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lorra Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-08-23 · Storer - Not Racket Science: Smash Force Edition · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-12 · Storer - Not Racket Science: Smash Force Edition · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-09 · Baldwin · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lorra Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-07-22 · Baldwin · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Webster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-07 · Baldwin · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lorra Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-20 · Rase · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wendy Hubbert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-13 · Baldwin · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann Harrison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-11 · Rase · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Royce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-08 · Baldwin · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-07 · Rase · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karin Mottus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-04-28 · Wescott · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
50%
2W–2L · 52.8% of games
3.5
49.3%
68W–70L · 49.9% of games
4.0
0%
0W–6L · 22.3% of games
6.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 42.9% of games
7.0
47.4%
9W–10L · 54.4% of games
7.5
25%
1W–3L · 39.5% of games
7.0mixed
35.3%
6W–11L · 47.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
63 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
62 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
42 matches
#1 Singles
10%
20 matches
#2 Singles
8%
17 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal