← Search

Amy Chrebet

Colts Neck, NJ
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
141 matches · 52W–89L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Amy Chrebet to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history141 matches
L
2025-01-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lanae Herman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2024-12-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Chin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-5
L
2024-11-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Keiko Gendi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2024-11-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maria Quinones-Caputo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2024-10-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Keiko Gendi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2024-10-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shannon Guarascio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2024-10-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristen Striano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2024-09-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Chin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2024-08-04 · #3 Doubles · with Tina Wong championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2024-08-03 · #2 Doubles · with Amy Greenberg championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2024-06-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laureena McCormack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2024-06-07 · Monmouth: Notorious Ninjas · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Walsh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2021–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
75.6%
31W–10L · 60.1% of games
3.5
20.2%
18W–71L · 41% of games
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
54 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
29 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova