← Search

Ragan Washburn

— year-end
53 matches · 37W–16L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Ragan Washburn to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history53 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Washburn/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lindsey Myers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-26 · Lewis/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Courtney Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-11 · Brown/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Freddy Ojeda mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-23 · Leavell/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brooke Parker Justice
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-16 · Leavell/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shelby Ramsey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-08 · Leavell/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Josie Hammons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-02 · Leavell/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Josie Hammons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-05-31 · Brown/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jon Bell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-16 · Douglas/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Josie Hammons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-05-06 · Sheahan/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Sheahan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-05 · Sheahan/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Josie Hammons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-05-02 · Douglas/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Josie Hammons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
Teams45 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
100%
5W–0L · 70.9% of games
4.0
74.3%
26W–9L · 61.7% of games
4.5
20%
1W–4L · 46.2% of games
7.5
60%
3W–2L · 56.2% of games
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
12 matches
#1 Singles
4%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer