← Search

Josie Hammons

— year-end
83 matches · 59W–24L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Josie Hammons to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history83 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Washburn/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Warren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
Ann Sneed / Emily Brown
2026-09-03 · Lewis/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Elizabeth Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-29 · Glasgow/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ann Sneed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-27 · Washburn/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lindsey Myers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-08-26 · Lewis/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Samantha Douglas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-08-20 · Washburn/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Warren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
Joanna Fuhrman / Lori Jones
2026-07-21 · Leavell/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristen Griffith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-06 · Leavell/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alison Rice
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-22 · Leavell/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with E'Lane Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-08 · Leavell/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ragan Washburn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-02 · Leavell/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ragan Washburn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-05-16 · Douglas/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ragan Washburn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
Teams46 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
100%
7W–0L · 82.4% of games
4.0
74.4%
29W–10L · 61.1% of games
4.5
55%
11W–9L · 50.8% of games
7.5
81.8%
9W–2L · 68.8% of games
8.5
50%
2W–2L · 52.1% of games
4.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
15 matches
#1 Singles
17%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
12 matches
#2 Singles
11%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King