← Search

Hilary Noden

Bordentown, NJ
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
132 matches · 94W–38L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Hilary Noden to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history132 matches
W
2026-08-17 · Love65 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mona Jaffe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-10 · Love65 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chari McClary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-25 · That Team · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-06-22 · Love65 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mona Jaffe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-06-19 · 2 Bucks & Beyond · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-10 · Mercer United · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-03 · Mercer United · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mona Jaffe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-01 · Love65 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mona Jaffe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-05-27 · Mercer United · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-05-21 · That Team · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-05-18 · Great Dames · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Suzanne Crosby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-05-13 · Mercer United · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
100%
4W–0L · 86% of games
4.0
70.5%
55W–23L · 56.9% of games
7.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
77.8%
14W–4L · 59.4% of games
6.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
78.6%
11W–3L · 66.7% of games
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 44% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 33% of the time
#1 Singles
33%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
27 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
18 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert