← Search

Diane Sauer

CARY, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
226 matches · 137W–89L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Diane Sauer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history226 matches
W
2026-09-02 · Sa.Wood40C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Christina Loaiza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-31 · Di.Sauer55C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tobi Buckley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-24 · Di.Sauer55C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tobi Buckley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-12 · Sa.Wood40C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tobi Buckley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-11 · ACP.Terjesen · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kimberlei Gill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-05 · Sa.Wood40C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amber Cagle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-04 · ACP.Terjesen · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Virgina Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-22 · ACP.Terjesen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tobi Buckley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-01 · ACP.Terjesen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristine Potter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-18 · Ki.Lamm18T · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tobi Buckley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-06-17 · ACP.Terjesen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tobi Buckley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
Wilda Eade / Beth Johnson
2026-06-10 · ACP.Terjesen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tobi Buckley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
69.2%
92W–41L · 57.3% of games
6.5
54.5%
24W–20L · 55.7% of games
7.5
47.4%
18W–20L · 51.6% of games
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 56.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
96 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
82 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
48 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal