← Search

Kelsey Jensen

— year-end
22 matches · 14W–8L · seasons 2023–2027

Captains: add Kelsey Jensen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history22 matches
L
2026-09-11 · WAG JOHNSON/BALUSEK · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2023-06-19 · OKC: Double Trouble · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2023-06-19 · Tennis Junkies · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leslie Bray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2023-06-17 · OKC: Double Trouble · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2023-06-15 · Madden/Landis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Patel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2023-06-09 · OKC: Double Trouble · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2023-06-05 · Tennis Junkies · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leslie Bray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2023-05-31 · Madden/Landis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chelsea Ragland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2023-05-24 · Madden/Landis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Patel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
Amber Price / Elizabeth Hayes
2023-05-22 · Tennis Junkies · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deanna Carter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2023-05-17 · Madden/Landis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chelsea Ragland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2023-05-15 · Tennis Junkies · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Teams13 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 66.1% of games
4.0
53.3%
8W–7L · 48.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 27% of the time
#1 Doubles
27%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
5 matches
#2 Singles
18%
4 matches
#1 Singles
9%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova