← Search

Catherine Chan

Holly Springs, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
91 matches · 31W–60L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Catherine Chan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history91 matches
W
2026-08-19 · CAS.DeAngelis · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Terri Jacobsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-17 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rossana Bolla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Patricia Gaudino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
Jena Turfler / Tracy Jones
2026-06-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rossana Bolla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Colleen Moody
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-06-12 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rossana Bolla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Patricia Gaudino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-14 · CAS.DeAngelis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michiyo Pedersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-04-08 · CAS.DeAngelis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barbara Longobardo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-04-07 · CAS.DeAngelis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Judith McGowan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-06 · CAS.DeAngelis · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-24 · CAS.DeAngelis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barbara Longobardo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 45.9% of games
3.0
28.1%
16W–41L · 42.1% of games
5.5
52.2%
12W–11L · 48.9% of games
6.5
25%
1W–3L · 38.8% of games
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
22 matches
#1 Singles
4%
4 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer