← Search

Jill Cardella

Cary, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
219 matches · 104W–115L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Jill Cardella to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history219 matches
L
2026-09-08 · TOC.Wilson · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cheryl Morgenstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-03 · TOC.Sager · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kelly Polizzi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
Mary Parker / Donna Lee
2026-09-01 · TOC.Wilson · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kathryn Jezior
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-08-31 · TOC.Haney · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Denise Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-08-25 · TOC.Wilson · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Anne Farmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-20 · TOC.Sager · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kathryn Jezior
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-11 · TOC.Wilson · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kathryn Jezior
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-08-03 · TOC.Haney · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nicole Gagnon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-23 · TOC.Friddle · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stacy Brehm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-22 · ACP.Sinopoli · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Hoffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-16 · TOC.Friddle · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Tobey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-17 · ACP.Sinopoli · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janet Constantino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams57 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
100%
4W–0L · 60.5% of games
3.0
60.8%
62W–40L · 54.5% of games
3.5
12.5%
5W–35L · 32.5% of games
6.5
47.6%
30W–33L · 47.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
81 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
68 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
48 matches
#1 Singles
4%
8 matches
#2 Singles
4%
8 matches
#3 Singles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe