← Search

Vanessa Colaco

— year-end
44 matches · 32W–12L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Vanessa Colaco to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history44 matches
W
N/A
2026-07-09 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anita Lohrs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-29 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eve Kecskes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-01-11 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Allan Colaco mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-12-05 · Chestnut Ridge · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Goldner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-24 · Chestnut Ridge · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Wenacur
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-02 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Mckeever mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
W
2025-10-29 · Chestnut Ridge · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Rothenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
Courtis Douglas / Colette Sible
2025-10-18 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Allan Colaco mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
W
2025-08-17 · #4 Doubles · with Katie Sweeney championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2025-08-16 · #2 Doubles · with Kate Mitchell championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2025-08-15 · #4 Doubles · with Kate Mitchell championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2025-06-20 · Chestnut Ridge - Servivors · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Sweeney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
Teams15 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
94.4%
17W–1L · 68.8% of games
3.5
68.8%
11W–5L · 59% of games
7.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 39.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova