← Search

Lisa Mulholland

ARNOLD, MD
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
151 matches · 82W–69L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Lisa Mulholland to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history151 matches
L
2026-08-31 · Baldwin · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracy Seybert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-26 · Baldwin · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kellie Gough McLendon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-23 · Baldwin · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allie Hildebrand
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-15 · Baldwin · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelsey Forbes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-08-12 · Baldwin · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Fabiola Custodio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-27 · Stellar Strikers 40+ · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Roshni Fifadra
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-25 · Stellar Strikers 40+ · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Dodd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-15 · Stellar Strikers 40+ · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Dodd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-12 · Stellar Strikers 40+ · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Denise Browne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-11 · Baldwin · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leann Gibbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-07-07 · Baldwin · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cyndi Casey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-06 · Stellar Strikers 40+ · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Denise Browne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
71.4%
15W–6L · 60.4% of games
3.5
55.3%
26W–21L · 51.9% of games
4.0
18.5%
5W–22L · 40.7% of games
5.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
58.3%
7W–5L · 50.4% of games
7.5
25%
1W–3L · 44.4% of games
2.5mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 61.8% of games
6.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
62.5%
10W–6L · 53.5% of games
7.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
61 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
34 matches
#1 Singles
10%
15 matches
#2 Singles
4%
6 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer