← Search

Leann Gibbs

Arnold, MD
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
176 matches · 98W–78L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Leann Gibbs to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history176 matches
L
2026-09-10 · Baldwin · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marina Anglim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-30 · Kelly/Jacobson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Ritter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-25 · Kelly/Jacobson · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mike Kelly mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-08-15 · Baldwin · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Gownley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-28 · Baldwin · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Gownley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-07-27 · Kelly/Jacobson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Ritter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
N/A
2026-07-16 · Baldwin · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Gownley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-12 · Slice Girls Divas 7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-11 · Baldwin · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Mulholland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-06-13 · Baldwin · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristen Burke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-06-07 · Slice Girls Divas 7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Claire Rossmark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-01 · Slice Girls Divas 7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Iliff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
2.5
100%
4W–0L · 77.8% of games
3.0
71.4%
35W–14L · 59.9% of games
3.5
42.6%
23W–31L · 46% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
60%
12W–8L · 55.2% of games
7.0
50%
6W–6L · 52.5% of games
8.0
0%
0W–6L · 32.7% of games
3.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
78.6%
11W–3L · 61.4% of games
7.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 60.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
56 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
31 matches
#1 Singles
15%
27 matches
#2 Singles
7%
13 matches
#3 Singles
6%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova