← Search

Ann Marie Mirabella

Essex Fells, NJ
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
30 matches · 9W–21L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Ann Marie Mirabella to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history30 matches
L
2026-02-05 · Fairfield · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2024-11-14 · Fairfield · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Castellano-Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2024-10-31 · Fairfield · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Milleisen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-6
W
2024-10-24 · Fairfield · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Milleisen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2022-11-10 · Centercourt Florham Park 1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jayne Hanley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L
2022-10-13 · Centercourt Florham Park 1 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2022-05-05 · Daisey Cutters · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joan Perricone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2022-03-31 · Centercourt Chatham 2 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2022-02-10 · Centercourt Chatham 2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sinead Bennett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2021-06-16 · Team Bakst · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yvonne Evelyn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
W
2021-03-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sheila Deguines
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2021-02-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Victoria Vigil
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
35%
7W–13L · 46.7% of games
4.0
22.2%
2W–7L · 42.9% of games
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
7 matches
#1 Singles
17%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal