← Search

Liza Eaton

Raleigh, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
88 matches · 55W–33L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Liza Eaton to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history88 matches
W
2026-08-31 · He.Tuttle40C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christina Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-24 · Li.Kempf18C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christina Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-20 · He.Tuttle40C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christina Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-08-10 · Li.Kempf18C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jessica Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-03 · Li.Kempf18C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jessica Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-05 · Ki.Meeker40T · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Griffin Lamb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-06-28 · Ki.Meeker40T · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Griffin Lamb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-25 · Lo.Elliott40M · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Timothy Franklin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-06-21 · #1 Doubles · with Griffin Lamb championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-20 · #4 Doubles · with Griffin Lamb championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Griffin Lamb championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
Jacqueline Morgan
2026-06-19 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
75.9%
22W–7L · 65.7% of games
3.5
28.6%
6W–15L · 43.2% of games
6.5
65%
13W–7L · 54.8% of games
3.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
10 matches
#1 Singles
9%
8 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#3 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova