← Search

Lisa Bakowski

Raleigh, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
251 matches · 156W–95L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lisa Bakowski to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history251 matches
W
2026-09-04 · EBlack-DUR · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ngoc Tran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-09-01 · El.Black40C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Neepa Patel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-08-21 · EBlack-DUR · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Neepa Patel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-31 · EBlack-DUR · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Kazmierczak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-28 · La.Ross18T · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Karg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-16 · Je.Wolborsky40M · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Adam Bakowski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-12 · Ca.Conzola40T · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lynelle Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · La.Ross18T · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Karg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-25 · Je.Wolborsky40M · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Adam Bakowski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-14 · Ca.Conzola40T · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Cokas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-07 · Ca.Conzola40T · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Cokas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-04 · Je.Wolborsky40M · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Adam Bakowski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
69.2%
18W–8L · 57.7% of games
3.0
64.9%
72W–39L · 56.2% of games
3.5
18.2%
2W–9L · 37.1% of games
5.0
100%
6W–0L · 74.7% of games
5.5
48.3%
14W–15L · 49.2% of games
6.5
82.9%
29W–6L · 63.3% of games
3.0mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 38.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
103 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
78 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
50 matches
#2 Singles
4%
10 matches
#1 Singles
4%
9 matches
#3 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe