← Search

Madelie Brand

Cary, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
137 matches · 101W–36L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Madelie Brand to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history137 matches
W
2026-09-03 · TOC.Allara · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tanya Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-08-24 · TOC.Goulding · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Aline Laborde
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-08-20 · TOC.Allara · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Geraldine Klauber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-17 · TOC.Goulding · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jennifer Reese
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-10 · TOC.Goulding · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jennifer Reese
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-1
L
2026-08-06 · TOC.Allara · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Geraldine Klauber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
N/A
2026-08-03 · TOC.Goulding · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jennifer Bricker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-29 · NMAC.Mitchell · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jette Efsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-07-15 · TOC.Baddour · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Trang Huynh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
Cary Armstrong / Julie Rogers
2026-07-06 · TOC.Baddour · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Trang Huynh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-05 · NMAC.Mitchell · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jette Efsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-29 · NMAC.Mitchell · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jette Efsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
81.8%
9W–2L · 69.2% of games
4.0
87.2%
34W–5L · 64.5% of games
4.5
52.9%
18W–16L · 54.9% of games
7.5
90.9%
10W–1L · 61.8% of games
8.5
78.1%
25W–7L · 62.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
60 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
30 matches
#1 Singles
5%
7 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches
#3 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer