← Search

Tuesday Evers

— year-end
191 matches · 128W–63L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Tuesday Evers to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history191 matches
W
2026-03-30 · Leonard 18s 4.0W/GR · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Betsy Bryce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2025-12-09 · TULSA: Hale/4.0W/LF · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patti Burton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2025-11-23 · Burton/LF/DAY4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patti Burton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2025-11-17 · TULSA: Hale/4.0W/LF · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with April Bonnet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-11-06 · TULSA: Hale/4.0W/LF · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with April Bonnet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2025-11-05 · Burton/LF/DAY4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gina Brim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-10-27 · TULSA: Hale/4.0W/LF · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2025-10-22 · Burton/LF/DAY4.0 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-10-15 · Burton/LF/DAY4.0 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-10-13 · TULSA: Hale/4.0W/LF · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Betsy Bryce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-10-09 · TULSA: Hale/4.0W/LF · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-10-08 · Burton/LF/DAY4.0 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
Teams37 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
50%
3W–3L · 50% of games
3.5
80%
36W–9L · 58.6% of games
4.0
67%
73W–36L · 55.7% of games
4.5
42.1%
8W–11L · 42% of games
6.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 50% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 55.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 41% of the time
#1 Singles
41%
79 matches
#2 Singles
23%
43 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
18 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert