← Search

Rebecca Mink

— year-end
24 matches · 8W–16L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Rebecca Mink to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history24 matches
L
2025-11-11 · Johnson/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robbie Johnson-Weinberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
2025-11-09 · Johnson/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bronia Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
Paige Vaughan / Jennifer London
2025-11-08 · Flanders/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Rasch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2025-11-04 · Flanders/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Courtney Woodmansee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2025-10-25 · Flanders/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Wiuff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2025-09-17 · Flanders/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shanna Eason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-09-13 · Flanders/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mary Trotz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2025-04-26 · Livingston/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Trotz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-03-22 · Livingston/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kiersten Schnacke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2025-03-16 · Woodmansee/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gina Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-03-01 · Livingston/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Battaile
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2024-11-16 · Livingston/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sara Yarrow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
Teams25 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
43.8%
7W–9L · 51.8% of games
4.0
0%
0W–6L · 31.7% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
5 matches
#1 Singles
8%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova